Why Does Misinformation Resonate So Well?

Why Does Misinformation Resonate So Well?

Thunder Bay – COVID-19 – Over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a flood of information posted on social media.

Social media giants, Facebook and Twitter started to put control warnings on some posts on their platforms.

Negative information has the ability to move quickly. In politics, candidates and the public often state how much they do not like negative campaign ads. However we still see those kinds of ads all the time.

Why? Fact is negative ads work.

Winston Churchill – “In wartime, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies.”

That is reinforced by a recent study that highlights two of the reasons that misinformation about COVID-19 is so difficult to tackle on social media: First, most people think they’re above average at spotting misinformation; and second, misinformation often triggers negative emotions that resonate with people.

The findings may help communicators share accurate information more effectively.

“This study gives us more insight into how users respond to misinformation about the pandemic on social media platforms,” says Yang Cheng, first author of the study and an assistant professor of communication at North Carolina State University. “It also gives us information we can use to share accurate information more effectively.”

One of the most powerful findings was that study participants overwhelmingly thought that other people were more vulnerable to misinformation. This phenomenon is known as the “third-person effect,” which predicts that people perceive media messages as having a greater effect on others than on themselves.

“This makes it harder to get people to participate in media literacy education or training efforts, because it suggests that most people think everyone else needs the training more than they do,” Cheng says.

The researchers also found that content containing misinformation was likely to evoke negative emotions such as fear, worry and disgust. That’s troubling for two reasons.

“First, people are likely to act on content that evokes negative emotions, and that includes sharing information on social media,” Cheng says. “Second, messages that are focused on emotions are more easily transmitted on social media than content that is neutral – such as abstract scientific information.”

However, Cheng also notes that science communicators could make use of this information.

“Since fear, worry, or other negative emotions can facilitate information seeking, or encourage people to avoid specific behaviors during a crisis, communicators may want to consider using these emotional messages to convey accurate information about COVID-19 and public health.”

The researchers also found that the better an individual thought he or she was at detecting misinformation in relation to everyone else, the more likely that individual was to support both government restrictions on misinformation and corrective actions, such as media literacy education. Participants who experienced negative emotions were also more likely to support government restrictions.

For this study, researchers conducted a survey of 1,793 U.S. adults. The survey asked a range of questions designed to address four issues: the extent to which study participants felt they and others were affected by COVID misinformation online; the extent to which misinformation triggered negative emotions; their support for government restrictions on social media and misinformation; and their support for media literacy training and other corrective actions.

Previous articleStudy Links Teen Sleep Disruption to Depression
Next articleDecember 8, 2020 – Government of Canada COVID-19 Update
NetNewsledger.com or NNL offers news, information, opinions and positive ideas for Thunder Bay, Ontario, Northwestern Ontario and the world. NNL covers a large region of Ontario, but are also widely read around the country and the world. To reach us by email: newsroom@netnewsledger.com Reach the Newsroom: (807) 355-1862