Anishinabek Nation leadership on regressive Supreme Court decision

UOI Grand Council Chief Glen Hare
OnChief Glen Hare
The Supreme Court of Canada today struck down the country's prostitution laws in a unanimous 9-0 ruling
The Supreme Court of Canada

ANISHINABEK NATION HEAD OFFICE — Anishinabek Nation Grand Council Chief Glen Hare is concerned with the Supreme Court decision that federal lawmakers do not have a duty to consult with Indigenous people before introducing legislation that might affect constitutionally protected Aboriginal and treaty rights.

“Yesterday’s ruling from Canada’s highest court was very disappointing for the Anishinabek Nation. As Anishinabe, we expect the honour of the Crown to be the premise of our treaty relationship,” expresses Grand Council Chief Hare. “However, based on yesterday’s ruling, it appears that Canada has set a precedence and is now positioned with the support it requires from its courts system to not be held accountable when they avoid having any real meaningful dialogue with Anishinabe on decisions that may encroach on treaty rights and ultimately affect us. There is nothing honourable in this approach.”

The federal lawmakers argued that such an obligation would slow down the legislative process.

In its 7-2 decision, the top court has ruled against the Mikisew Cree First Nation in Alberta, which had argued that two omnibus budget bills introduced by the former Conservative federal government in 2012 affected its constitutionally protected treaty rights because they amended regulatory protections for waterways and the environment.

Interim Lake Huron Regional Deputy Chief Scott McLeod also believes that this self-imposed authority by Canada’s lawmakers to forego consultations with Indigenous peoples before introducing legislation sets a precedent that can have impacts on First Nations.

“If this decision was apparently required to set out principals for the necessity of ‘parliamentary supremacy’ in its capacity of drafting legislation and should not be interfered by a duty to consult, who gave them this supremacy? Themselves? Indigenous Nations never gave, sold, transferred or signed away this supreme authority over us—it was blatantly assumed,” says Chief McLeod. “They have already admitted the recognition of our Nationhood and need to deal with us on a ‘Nation-to-Nation’ relationship. We signed Treaties Nation-to-Nation, therefore, we need to develop legislation Nation-to-Nation.”

Those amendments reduced government oversight of lands and waters and thus threatened its established right to hunt, trap and fish on their traditional territory. These rights were guaranteed by the Crown when it signed Treaty 8 in 1899, and were enshrined as constitutional rights after the passage of the Constitution Act of 1982.

The Mikisew Cree argued the Government of Canada should have consulted them before it drafted the legislation and before it was tabled in Parliament.

The Anishinabek Nation is the political advocate for 40 member communities across Ontario, representing approximately 60,000 people. The Anishinabek Nation is the oldest political organization in Ontario and can trace its roots back to the Confederacy of Three Fires, which existed long before European contact.

Previous articleCandidate’s Ledger – Kim Ducharme – Councillor at Large
Next articleNAN – Justice Patrick Smith Controversy Disrespectful or NNL offers news, information, opinions and positive ideas for Thunder Bay, Ontario, Northwestern Ontario and the world. NNL covers a large region of Ontario, but are also widely read around the country and the world. To reach us by email: Reach the Newsroom: (807) 355-1862